Showing posts with label Quebec election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Quebec election. Show all posts

Saturday, August 25, 2012

CAQ second to PQ in Quebec election polls. Liberals in third!


As voting day nears in the Quebec provincial election, the Liberal Party led by Quebec Premier Jean Charest is running in third place in an August 24th poll. The separatist Parti Quebecois remains in first place.
Voters in Quebec go the polls September 4 to elect a new provincial government. An August 24th poll by Leger Marketing showed the Parti Quebecois (PQ) leading with 33 per cent of the vote. The newer party the CAQ(Coalition Avenir Quebec) has overtaken the ruling Liberal Party with 28% and the Liberals were third with 27%. The trend seems to be favoring the CAQ as both Liberal and the PQ seem to be losing votes to the CAQ.
The CAQ party leader Francois Legault is playing down the whole idea of a referendum on Quebec independence. Legault claims he is a nationalist rather than a sovereigntist or federalist meaning that he neither supports independence for Quebec nor does he support a federalist government. The first is the position of the PQ and the second of the ruling Liberal Party. Only 45% of Quebecers in an Angus Reid poll believe Legault would oppose sovereignty. Legault was a minister in a former PQ government before leaving the party.
Charest continually warns voters that to vote for CAQ is the same as voting PQ. Legault has said he would vote "no" if there is a third referendum. Legault promises to keep the issue on the backburner for a decade if his party wins the election. Legault promises that if elected:
“I will defend neither sovereignty nor Canadian unity.”
While a somewhat negative promise no doubt it is meant to distinguish his position from that of the Liberals and the PQ. Legault's tactics seem to be working. The CAQ has attracted up to a quarter of those who voted Liberal last election and even 15% from the PQ. The PQ is holding on to more of their voters than the Liberals.
Legault did well in a debate with the other two leaders according to many. He also echoed Obama's successful slogan "Yes, we can." by insisting "We can do it." Legault is critical of the power of Quebec unions. He is likely to capture right wing votes even among anglophones.


Monday, August 20, 2012

Jean Charest fights back in Quebec election debates


Down in the polls, Quebec Premier Jean Charest came out swinging in the leaders' debate last night. He claimed that the PQ (Parti Quebecois) main objective was to separate from Canada,. He also pointed out that a past PQ government was corrupt.
Charest took an aggressive stance against his opponents. A skilled debater, Charest tried to neutralize constant attacks upon his own government for corruption by pointing out that in 2006 a report found that the PQ had acted illegally in its financing activities. Charest's Liberal government is plagued by corruption charges especially in the Quebec construction industry. Charest also pressed hard on the sovereignty issue trying to portray the PQ and leader Pauline Marois as wanting to hold a referendum on sovereignty as quickly as she can. The PQ is leading at present in the polls.
Ironically Marois tried to steer clear of the sovereignty issue. She was criticized not just by Charest but by another separatist party the left-leaning Quebec Solidaire.co-leader Francoise David:
“What I can’t understand is why you can’t clearly commit to a public consultation to define how you plan on achieving sovereignty,."
Marois no doubt realizes that there is more concern with jobs and the economy of Quebec among voters than independence for the province. She is not anxious to hold a referendum that she could very well lose.
While Jean Charest predicted he would be the target of all the opposition parties he shared that status with the Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper. The PQ leader in particular promised that she would stand up for Quebec against the federal government and gain more power for Quebec. Marois chastised both the leader of the CAQ and Charest
:“I won’t get on my knees like Mr. Charest has done and abandon the fight against Ottawa as [Coalition Avenir Québec Leader François] Legault has done..I will fight for the interests of Quebec.”
The PQ promises that it will seek transfer of more powers from the federal government to the province if elected. The party wants power to regulate immigration as well as unemployment insurance. If the federal government refuses to transfer the powers the PQ will use this as an argument that Quebec should become independent.
Charest faces not just his usual rival the PQ this election but also the Coalition Avenir Quebec a party that trails the Liberals only slightly in the polls. The party is led by a former PQ cabinet minister Francois Legault. The party is regarded by many as an alternative to the two old line parties who many see as corrupt. The Liberals appear to be losing votes to the party among non-francophone voters. This could create problems for Charest and help the PQ win. However Legault lacks charisma and some thought he would not do too well in the debates.
Legault however seemed to hold his own in the debate. He made cogent points against Charest's economic record pointing out that during Charest's tenure Quebec disposable income per person went from fourth place to ninth place with only the tiny province of Prince Edward Island being lower. Charest has been touting his economic record as a reason to re-elect him. Charest in the exchange was able to catch Legault off guard when he asked if Quebeckers were richer today than when Legault's former party was in power. Legault admitted that they were. Even though this is hardly relevant since Legault is not part of the PQ now it no doubt may have helped Charest fend off the attack.
Almost twenty per cent of voters are undecided. Three parties remain relatively close in the polls although the PQ has a definite lead. There will be three more debates with one on one debates with leaders. Quebec Solidaire with just one seat in the legislature will not be in those debates.


Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/331156#ixzz246LL4yAb

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Quebec election debate tonight August 19


The Quebec provincial election is set for September 4. With the campaign now half way through there is to be a key debate between leaders tonight (Aug 19) The ruling Liberal Party lead by premier Jean Charest is trailing in the polls.
The CBC(Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) will carry the debate from 8 PM to 10 PM eastern time. The debate will also be available on line at CBCNews.ca. The debate will be in French with English translation.
At dissolution of the provincial legislature on August 1st the ruling Quebec Liberals had 64 seats, the Parti Quebecois 47, the Coaltion Avenir Quebec 9 and Quebec Solidair 1. Recent polls show the Liberals trailing the PQ(Parti Quebecois)
An August 16 poll by Leger Marketing show the Liberals with 28%, the PQ with 33% and the up and coming CAQ(Coalition Avenir Quebec) with 27%. Quebec Solidaire has 6%. A bid by another party Option Nationale to take part in the debates failed as a court did not support their injunction to force the stations involved to include their leader.
Jean Charest of the Liberals claims he will be the target of the opposition groups:
"I will be the target. There's no doubt about that...You know that. I know that. I have have been the target for the last four years, frankly, and that's what this debate will be about, so we'll just have to deal with it."
Although the general public supported Charest's raising of tuition fees that caused lengthy strikes and demonstrations by Quebec students many opposed the bill that imposed strict conditions on demonstrations and heavy penalties for breaking them. However, much criticism of Charest claims widespread corruption in the government especially in relation to the construction industry.
Charest in the past has triumphed in some debates. In 2003 after a debate with PQ leader Bernard Landry his poll numbers rose and he managed election in spite of predictions he would lose.
Francois Legault leader of the CAQ has less experience than the other two main party leaders will face a stiff test of his political skills. He is not known for his oratory and sometimes has had to take back statements he has made. However the party is doing well in the polls just behind the ruling Liberals. Quebec Solidaire a leftist party will have a chance to raise its profile.


Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Quebec to hold election on September 4th

Premier of Quebec Jean Charest has triggered an election on September 4 after a meeting this morning with his cabinet. Charest's Liberal government has slumped in polls as investigations continue into corruption in the Quebec construction industry Quebec premier Jean Charest is the longest-serving premier of any province. However, he is facing a fierce battle this time around. Not only are there damaging corruption investigations ongoing but many citizens are upset by the harsh conditions imposed on demonstrators by Bill 78. The bill created even more demonstrations by students and others.

 The main opposition is the Parti Quebecois (PQ) led by Pauline Marois. The party is for the independence of Quebec as Wikipedia notes:. The Parti Québécois (PQ) is a centre-left provincial political party that advocates national sovereignty for the province of Quebec and secession from Canada. The Party traditionally has support from the labour movement. Marois has been party leader since 2007. At a news conference this morning Marois set out her separatist views: "We prefer that Quebec be a normal country. We choose freedom," . "In the coming weeks, it will be our turn to choose. It is not Canada's duty to pick our government for us, it's our turn to decide by voting." The Parti Quebecois also faces opposition from The Coalition Avenir Quebec formed early this year. The new party has merged with the existing Action Democratique du Quebec. Polls show that the party is trailing the two main parties. There are other parties as well in the contest.

Charest has been in power since 2003 and is attempting to win a fourth term. While not endorsing any party student leaders will campaign against Charest and the Liberals. Student organizations hope to see the government replaced. Polls show the Liberals and Parti Quebecois neck in neck with about 32 per cent support each while the Coalition Avenir Quebec is in third place with 20 per cent.

 An important issue in the election will be the tuition hikes that brought long and sustained protests against the government. While the majority of citizens actually supported a hike there was strong reaction against the harsh terms of Bill 81 that severely restricted protests with stiff fines for violation of the regulations. Luc Turgeon a professor at the University of Ottawa said:"This election is about the future of the province,"...."What has transpired in Quebec in the last few months is a bit of a social crisis." Many of the student organizations were concerned with more than just tuition. They were concerned about job prospects and the future of the province. Their concerns brought them support from some labor unions. Turgeon said there would be a debate about austerity programs and cuts to entitlements versus other strategies to cut the huge deficit the province faces.

The Charest government also faces corruption charges. Key Liberal politicians appear linked to questionable deals with the construction industry. The election will occur before an inquiry into corruption will resume later in September.

Charest will attempt to portray the Parti Quebecois as wishing to immediately have a referendum on Quebec sovereignty. Polls shows that as of now of those who have made up their mind 62 per cent would vote against separation. No doubt jobs and the economy loom larger in the minds of many voters. Even if elected the Parti Quebecois is likely to put off any referendum until polls are more in their favor. The campaign promises to be quite heated with no clear winner at the start of campaigning. For more see this article.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Quebec leaders in final campaign push.

This is from the CBC.
It would seem that Charest may possibly get his majority although perhaps the recent attacks by Harper on the Bloc may help out the PQ somewhat. A bit ironic that Conservative attacks should hurt the provincial Quebec Liberals!


Quebec leaders in final campaign push ahead of Monday's vote
Last Updated: Saturday, December 6, 2008 6:42 PM ET
The Canadian Press
With less than 48 hours to go before Quebecers hit the polls, a relaxed Jean Charest spent an unhurried Saturday on the campaign trail.Quebec Liberal Party Leader Jean Charest and his wife Michele Dionne walk to a multifunctional sport complex during a campaign stop in Trois-Rivires, Que., Saturday. (Jacques Boissinot/Canadian Press)
Recent polls suggest Charest's Liberals have a comfortable 15-percentage-point lead on their closest rivals, the Parti Québécois .
But the premier said his easy pace doesn't mean he is taking anything for granted.
It's instead a lesson learned during the campaign in 2007, Charest said — that it's best to hold back now and focus efforts on election day.
"It's great to be able to target as many ridings as possible and meet the people," he said.
"But you also have to take the time to prepare for election day so we can be as efficient as possible on the ground."
However, his political adversaries were out campaigning in full force.
Mario Dumont, leader of the Action democratique party, criss-crossed the province, attending eight rallies in a last-ditch effort to gain ground.Parti Quebecois Leader Pauline Marois walks with Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe to a dairy farm during a campaign stop in Compton, Que., Saturday. (Jacques Boissinot/Canadian Press)
"There remains a good proportion of undecided voters," he told supporters in Trois-Rivières.
"And these people who are undecided are really just looking for a reason to vote for the ADQ. They're just asking to be convinced — to be given a little bit of conviction."
The ADQ is mired in third place with polls suggesting only about 15 per cent of Quebecers intend to vote for the right-leaning party.
Dumont held back from attacking Charest and PQ Leader Pauline Marois, and instead tried to paint the ADQ as a political party that offers something new to Quebecers.
"We have a positive message for Quebecers this weekend and that's what we'll focus on," Dumont told supporters on Montreal's south shore.
He also refused to comment on the latest poll results, insisting voters are still willing to change their minds and support a party he said is able to bring change to Quebec.ADQ leader Mario Dumont arrives for a campaign stop in east-end Montreal on Saturday. (Ryan Remiorz/Canadian Press)
"There are two parties that have their feet anchored in the past," he said.
"There's only one party that presented Quebecers with a project for a new Quebec, an autonomous society, a proud society."
Marois stayed on the offensive, warning voters a majority-Liberal government would only bring suffering to Quebecers in the long run and demonizing Charest as a leader who hid his real intentions and lied to win voter support.
Marois was joined on the campaign trail by Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe. She visited 15 key ridings across Quebec. Her organizers targeted ridings where the PQ is running neck-and-neck with its rivals.

Friday, December 5, 2008

Charest on track to win third straight mandate.

The article does not say whether Charest will achieve a majority but the polls suggest perhaps he will. However, like the stock market there is a lot of volatility in the environment these days! Harper will probably strike out in Quebec after his recent remarks if an election is called early next year. However, the Liberals are likely to cave and abandon the Coalition I imagine. This is from the Globe and Mail.


Charest on track to win third straight mandate
Liberals will prevail despite turmoil in Ottawa, poll says
RHÉAL SÉGUIN
From Friday's Globe and Mail
December 5, 2008 at 6:00 AM EST
QUEBEC CITY — Jean Charest looks set to become the first Quebec Premier to win three consecutive mandates since Maurice Duplessis a half century ago.
The latest public opinion poll, taken over the past week as the crisis in Ottawa unfolded, suggests Quebeckers are seeking stability and clear government leadership as the economy worsens.
Monday's vote will be a test of the consequences of the extraordinary drama that played out in Ottawa. A firestorm of rhetoric, brought on by Prime Minister Stephen Harper's framing of the proposed NDP-Liberal coalition as nothing more than a backdoor entry to power for the separatist Bloc Québécois, has dominated headlines, knocking the provincial election lower in newscasts.
But, for now, with 72 hours to go, the polling for La Presse suggests Mr. Charest will win at the cost of the Parti Québécois.

The poll surveyed 1,001 Quebeckers between Nov. 28 and Dec. 3 and showed the Liberals leading with 45-per-cent support, comfortably ahead of the Parti Québécois at 29 per cent and the Action démocratique du Québec, trailing at 15 per cent.
Meanwhile, the Green Party was backed by 6 per cent of those surveyed and the left-wing, pro-sovereignty Québec Solidaire by 5 per cent. A poll this size is considered accurate within 3 percentage points 19 times out of 20.
The Liberals and the PQ were neck and neck among crucial francophone voters, which determine the fate of at least 80 of the province's 125 ridings, with Mr. Charest attracting 35 per cent of francophone support, slightly less than 36 per cent for the PQ.
However, the Liberal government's approval rating continued to drop, falling from 51 per cent to 48 per cent.
That hasn't stopped voters from considering Mr. Charest as the best leader for the province, picked by 43 per cent of those polled against 24 per cent for PQ Leader Pauline Marois and only 13 per cent for ADQ Leader Mario Dumont.
Support for Mr. Dumont has barely moved throughout the campaign. The party could be devastated after winning official opposition status in the 2007 election, unless Mr. Dumont is able to mount a last-minute surge. But with 70 per cent saying their choice was decided, Mr. Dumont's challenge appeared insurmountable, especially when the majority of those surveyed, 54 per cent, expressed little interest in the campaign.
Despite holding a comfortable lead, Liberals still remain concerned over the impact Mr. Harper's relentless attacks might have on nationalist voters.
Mr. Charest called for cooler heads to prevail by siding with the 1.3 million Quebeckers who voted for the Bloc Québécois in the past federal election. Mr. Harper's bare-knuckle political gamesmanship was seen as threatening to undermine Mr. Charest's appeal to nationalist voters.
"All Quebeckers deserve respect. In our democracy, we must respect the choices made by voters. ... If they chose to elect Bloc Québécois members, that choice must be respected," Mr. Charest said yesterday.
Mr. Harper continued to insist that no Canadian government should co-operate with a party seeking the breakup of the country. Those remarks prompted Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe to accuse Mr. Harper of reducing his elected members to second-class MPs in Parliament.
"Mr. Harper clearly stated that the elected officials in Quebec don't have the same value as the ones in the rest of Canada," Mr. Duceppe said yesterday.

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Flaherty economic statement draws fire in Quebec election.

THis is from CTV.

In most media the equalisation cuts mentioned by Flaherty do not even come up but obviously it is a big issue in Quebec. Quebec unions are also concerned about the public sector unions losing the right to strike and having salary caps as well.

Economic statement draws fire on Quebec election trail
Updated Fri. Nov. 28 2008 6:27 PM ET
The Canadian Press
MONTREAL -- While prompting political turmoil in Ottawa, the Conservatives' economic statement was also coming under fire Friday on the Quebec election trail.
The Tories' fiscal plan was being used by sovereigntists as ammunition against Premier Jean Charest.
The Parti Quebecois accused Charest of watching idly as the feds cut equalization payments to the province by $1 billion, and described the move as a catastrophic financial loss for the province.
PQ Leader Pauline Marois insisted the Charest Liberals knew in advance about cuts contained in federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's economic statement and did their best to cover them up.
"The facts have been hidden from us, we have been manipulated to make us believe things are going well," Marois said in Sept-Iles.
The PQ leader drew links between the federal economic statement and the financial update delivered by Quebec Finance Minister Monique Jerome-Forget on the eve of the provincial campaign for the Dec. 8 election.
Jerome-Forget has been accused of fudging the numbers and exaggerating the revenues anticipated from private corporate investment in Quebec.
The PQ suggests that was done to cover up the hole left by the reduced equalization payments.

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Charest's economics called into question


This is from the Star. Charest seems to have borrowed Harper's playbook on many issues including the idea that he will be a Great Helmsman during coming rocky seas. At the same time he is trying to make his economic performance better than it has actually been it would seem.
The ADQ (Acting Dimwits of Quebec) sounds to be a very reactionary group in that they want to sell off part of Quebec hydro to make it look as if they are being financially responsible but in fact letting investor contributors in a good profit making deal. It seems as if their fortunes are waning and the PQ may be coming back somewhat.

Charest's economics called into question TheStar.com - Canada - Charest's economics called into question
Premier's plan to win majority based on finances falters as opposition doubts claim of huge reserve
November 07, 2008 Andrew ChungQUEBEC BUREAU CHIEF
MONTREAL–One day down and already Quebec Premier Jean Charest's call to Quebecers to give him a majority based on his sound management of the economy has been dented over doubts about those very finances.
The controversy sucked some wind from Charest's gleeful sails yesterday as he tried to unveil more interventionist measures his government would undertake to stimulate the economy during a global financial crisis – including a hike in minimum wage and billions more for infrastructure to create jobs.
What Quebec's two opposition leaders question is Charest's claim to having a $2.3 billion reserve, which has allowed the government to forecast a zero deficit for this fiscal year and the next.
The province's auditor general, Renaud Lachance, cast doubt on the existence of that reserve earlier this week, pointing out that Quebec had a $5.8 billion deficit at the end of March 2007. He wouldn't divulge, however, what his own report on the state of Quebec's finances reveals. The report is typically released each fall, but when Charest called a provincial election Tuesday, the release was shelved.
Quebecers go to the polls Dec. 8.
Much rosier numbers than the auditor general's could undermine Charest's credibility on having managed Quebec's finances with "rigour," exactly the situation the opposition parties, which are down in the polls, hope for.
Both Action démocratique du Québec Leader Mario Dumont and Parti Québécois Leader Pauline Marois revealed yesterday they have sent letters to Lachance authorizing him to release his report. All three party leaders would have to agree to have the information released. "The numbers are all known," Charest said at a news conference in Montreal yesterday after repeated questioning on the matter, adding, "We have hid nothing."
Charest explained that the finance minister worked with the auditor general to impose accepted accounting standards on Quebec's finances, but legislation to shift the deficit into long-term debt was defeated in the National Assembly.
Charest said that when the Liberals were elected in 2003, the federal government announced it had given Quebec $3 billion too much and demanded it back. Quebec made a deal to pay it back in 10 years.
"The auditor general said it's necessary that we take the $3 billion and put it in the books this year. It's not true we're going to put that in the books this year with a balanced budget law. That means I'd have to cut $3 billion in services."
Charest tried to keep the focus on his economic plan, which he unveiled yesterday at a luncheon with a Montreal business audience.
For infrastructure, $4 billion more through 2013 for a total of $41 billion, which Charest said will help create 100,000 new jobs. For companies to access capital, $1 billion for its investment arm, the Société générale de financement. And an increase to the minimum wage by $1, to $9.50 per hour, over two years.
Also unveiling economic measures yesterday, Dumont promised to privatize 7.5 per cent of the giant Hydro-Québec, which would net $10 billion and help Quebec pay down its debt, which stands at about $150 billion. Marois proposed a $600 million plan that includes sending a $200 cheque to poor families, tax aid for home loans, and guaranteed loans for businesses.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Charest plagiarizing Harper

This is from the Globe and Mail.

Charest and the Quebec Liberals are shameless. Harper's comments and reasons for calling the recent Federal election are already fresh in everyone's memory! Charest may not follow Harper word for word just excuse for excuse.

Mr. Charest is said to have stood his ground, insisting that the campaign would underscore the opposition parties' lack of experience and credibility to manage the economy and that he alone was best equipped to lead the province through the economic storm.....

Mr. Charest's comments appeared to indicate that he had already made up his mind. He insisted that in times of economic hardship, the province would be better off with a steady hand at the helm, suggesting that a majority government is needed.
“It seems clear enough when you're in an [economic] situation like this, and you are in a minority, that means there are three pairs of hands on the steering wheel,” Mr. Charest said in Mirabel while attending an announcement by Pratt & Whitney to build a $575-million engine plant that will create 565 direct jobs. “What I saw on the weekend was that the other two opposition leaders do not want to go in the same direction as the government on the economic question.”

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

ADQ becomes official opposition in Quebec

Given that the ADQ has quite a few right wing policies I wonder if this will increase Harper's position federally in Quebec? There seems to be a reaction to immigration in Quebec especially in rural areas. You would think the reaction would be stronger in urban areas where the immigrants settle. It seems that prejudice can be even worse against those that people do not have any experience at all with. I remember a sociologist friend at Brandon did a survey in his class on feelings towards different groups. The strongest prejudice was not against aboriginals as I had thought might be the case but against Turks. Most of these students have probably never encountered a Turk in their whole life!


ADQ becomes Quebec's Official Opposition
Last Updated: Monday, March 26, 2007 | 8:42 PM ET
CBC News
The Action Démocratique du Québec captured 41 seats in Quebec's national assembly, and with them the title of Official Opposition in the new minority Liberal government.


Action Démocratique du Québec Leader Mario Dumont speaks to supporters at election night headquarters Monday.
(Clement Allard/Canadian Press) "This election campaign makes it official — we are a new voice, and this will allow us to shine both here and throughout the world," ADQ Leader Mario Dumont told supporters at his party headquarters in Rivière-du-Loup on Monday night.

The victory marked a coming of age for the party, which held five seats in the last session and needed only 12 to gain official party this time around.

Dumont said the results were "a very strong political message — a message of change.” Specifically, the ADQ's success signals a political shift to the right in Quebec.

The ADQ successfully tapped into latent conservatism in Quebec's francophone heartland with promises of:

Continue Article

A one per cent reduction in government spending.
An increase in private health-care delivery.
A reduction in the number of Quebecers on welfare.
Dumont, a 36-year-old married father of three, also emphasized family policies such as a child-care tax credit.

The ADQ's strong success also suggests Quebecers are tired of fighting every election on the issues of sovereignty.

Although Dumont supported sovereignty during the 1995 referendum campaign, he backed away from that position during this year's election campaign.

Instead, he said he supported an autonomous Quebec within Canada, and indicated he would not support any post-election bid for another sovereignty referendum by the Parti Québécois.

The ADQ, its leader and its right-of centre platform became a main target for both Liberal and PQ attacks after polls showed the ADQ was poised to snatch many more provincial legislature seats in 2007 than in 2003, and had become the favourite among francophone voters.

Bumps on campaign road
But the campaign was not always smooth for Dumont.

He was attacked for his position on Quebec sovereignty, which was interpreted differently by Liberal Leader Jean Charest and PQ Leader André Boisclair.

Charest warned voters that the ADQ was a "waiting room" for sovereigntists.

In contrast, Boisclair originally lumped Dumont’s sovereignty position in with Charest’s and Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s. But near the end of the campaign, he suggested Dumont might support a PQ bid for another sovereignity referendum — something that Dumont himself denied.

Dumont criticized for platform
Dumont was also attacked by his opponents for not revealing the financial details of his $1.7-billion platform until after the release of last week's federal budget, and was later accused of being unrealistic about how much the platform would cost.

In addition, the ADQ leader faced trouble from within his own party — he was forced to drop two candidates and rebuke a third for their controversial remarks about minorities and events recognizing violence against women.

In the latter part of the campaign, polls found that the number of respondents who thought Dumont would make the best premier slipped, causing some commentators to speculate that the party had peaked too early to maximize its success at the ballot box.

Come a long way
In the end, that speculation appeared unfounded. The 2007 election results show the ADQ and its leader have come a long way since Dumont co-founded the party with former Liberal Jean Allaire in 1994.

Dumont took the Rivière-du-Loup riding in 1994 to become the first ADQ member in the legislature.

He was re-elected as the sole ADQ representative in 1998, but the party won four more seats in subsequent byelections.

The ADQ took four seats in 2003 with 18 per cent of the popular vote and later won a fifth seat in the Vanier riding during a byelection in September 2004.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Three Quebec parties all close in the polls

Perhaps the Quebec voters are just tired of the old parties. It is too bad that does not happen more federally although the Green party is gaining significantly. The NDP does not seem to be in a "surge". Monday should be an interesting election night in Quebec!


Changing landscape



Mar 24, 2007 04:30 AM
Chantal Hebert

Monday's Quebec election is really the second phase in a dramatic shift in the political tectonic plates of the province that first came to notice in last year's federal vote.

The polarization between sovereignists and federalists that for so long shaped the Quebec landscape is no longer the defining feature of the province's politics.

On the left and the right, the issue of Quebec's future has ceased to command the first loyalties of thousands of voters. They are engaging in the electoral process on different terms.

The result is a landscape in great flux, that will continue to change over the course of the next set of federal and Quebec elections.

From that angle, the surge of the Action démocratique du Québec party during the past month is totally in sync with the logic of the last federal vote and the 10 unexpected Quebec seats that landed in Prime Minister Stephen Harper's lap on election night Jan. 23, 2006.

It has never been more obvious that the 2006Conservative advance was not a fluke than at the end of this topsy-turvy Quebec campaign. Harper's surprising score – one in four votes – was a symptom of a larger phenomenon that has now thrown all the traditional Quebec equations on their heads and replaced them with this weekend's uncertain numbers.

Just as Paul Martin and Gilles Duceppe did not anticipate the Conservative breakthrough last year, the Quebec Liberals and the Parti Québécois have spent the past four weeks at a loss to stem ADQ Leader Mario Dumont's momentum.

Indeed, Jean Charest and André Boisclair's efforts to rally their troops under the black-and-white flags of federalism and sovereignty have mainly resulted in sending more voters to the grey zone of the autonomous ADQ.

These efforts have so spectacularly backfired that the unity issue has virtually disappeared from the radar of the last stretch of the campaign, another first of sorts for a Quebec election.

According to the last CROP poll of the campaign, the result of their common failure to polarize the election along familiar lines will likely be the first minority government in modern Quebec history.

While Liberal leader Charest is entering the last weekend of the campaign with a nominal six-point lead overall, he is still running third with francophone voters. As in 1998, he could once again win the popular vote and lose the election.

At 34 per cent, 28 per cent and 25 per cent, the Liberals, PQ and ADQ, respectively, are also all significantly below the bar of a majority government. With numbers like those, it could take a while to determine who has secured the job of governing Quebec on Monday.

Dumont could even end up having the last word on which of his two opponents becomes the next premier. A mere 48 hours to the vote, he is poised to emerge as the power-broker in a reconfigured National Assembly.

After more than a decade of largely solitary efforts, the ADQ leader is expected to command a significant caucus for the first time in the wake of Monday's vote. As of then, his party would be a magnet for the talent and money that were in such short supply in its campaign this year.

Alone among the three leaders campaigning in this election, Dumont is virtually certain to be around to fight the next one.

Depending on the outcome on Monday, the days of at least one of his two main rivals could be numbered.

In what seems to have become a best-case scenario for his Liberals, Charest may yet squeak back to power but almost certainly without a majority.

He will also return to the National Assembly diminished in more than the number of members at his command.

Earlier this week, Charest expended a chunk of his national capital on trying to turn the tide of the election in his favour.

For almost a decade, he had been making the case for a better fiscal deal for Quebec, arguing that while surpluses were piling up on Parliament Hill, the bills for maintaining a solid social safety net were piling up in Quebec City.

Harper's budget went a long way to vindicate that position. Of all provinces, Quebec secured the sweetest deal on equalization last Monday.

But by pulling the rabbit of an income tax cut out of the hat of the federal budget, Charest has undermined his own rationale. The predictable reaction outside Quebec was a nascent backlash against a federal budget that seemed designed to allow the Quebec Liberal leader to buy his way back into power with equalization money.

Meanwhile in Quebec, the reaction to the sudden prospect of a Liberal tax cut was confusion rather than celebration.

If he comes in a close second behind Boisclair and the PQ on Monday night, Charest could hang on to power and try to strike a deal with Dumont, to pre-empt a PQ minority government.

There is no doubt that sovereignist voters would react with fury, but such an arrangement would at least spare the PQ the pain of spending another mandate failing to bring about a winning referendum.

If it manages to avoid a historical defeat and to crawl across the finish line in first place, it will largely be because of a combination of the efforts of former premier Jacques Parizeau and a favourable split in the votes resulting from the stronger ADQ presence rather than as the result of a surge in sovereignist fervour.

More so than any other sovereignist figure, Parizeau has carried Boisclair on his shoulders over the past month, tirelessly striving to bridge the gap between the PQ's disengaged traditional nationalist base and its rookie, urban leadership.

But even Parizeau cannot turn water into wine.

If the Quebec campaign had been a referendum on a referendum, the verdict would already be in. There is no impetus for a replay of the 1995 cliff-hanger vote on Quebec's political future. On the contrary, the belief that the chances for another referendum are remote has facilitated the exodus of federalist voters unhappy with Charest's first mandate to the ADQ.

Ironically, if the PQ ends up with the largest number of seats Monday night, it would do so with one of its lowest scores ever and only because so many Quebecers are convinced that in its old age, the party has become a toothless tiger.

Even the arts community, the very soul of the sovereignty movement, is branching out of the battle. In this campaign, many of its members lined up behind Quebec Solidaire, the province's fledging left-wing party.

If the PQ is returned to opposition on Monday, the search for a replacement will start on the morning after the election. But the party lacks a unifying figure. It does not have a leader of the stature of Lucien Bouchard, René Lévesque or Parizeau waiting in the wings.

The name most often mentioned to replace Boisclair is that of Gilles Duceppe. But in his role as Bloc leader – a position that involves never having to force an unpopular decision on a reluctant public – he, too, has been losing his Quebec audience, to the Conservatives but also to Stéphane Dion's Liberals and to the Green party.

One way or another, it looks like there will be no real closure for anyone on Monday. The next act in this saga will take place on the stage of the next federal election.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Quebec leaders complain of Harper interference.

Harper sometimes seems to not be well managed. Comments about negotiating only with a Federalist government hardly help federalists in Quebec but then Harper is not cosy with Liberals (the Federalists) but with BQ (federally) who support his budget so you would think he would be against Charest. But then Charest was a Conservative. It is hard to keep all these chameleons sorted out!Anyway I imagine that all three main Quebec parties would be even more upset if Harper had not intervened and given Quebec a hefty equalization payment to right the fiscal imbalance.

Quebec leaders decry Ottawa 'interference'
RHEAL SEGUIN AND BERTRAND MAROTTE

Globe and Mail Update

LAC MEGANTIC, Que. and QUEBEC CITY — Quebec Premier Jean Charest urged Prime Minister Stephen Harper to butt out of the Quebec election and told Canadians he has nothing to apologize for in using their money to cut Quebec income taxes.

Mr. Charest responded yesterday to Mr. Harper's comments saying that Ottawa will only negotiate limits on federal spending power with a federalist government in Quebec. The statement suggested that if Quebeckers want more federal funds and hope one day to find a permanent settlement to the fiscal imbalance, they will need to elect a federalist premier next Monday.

The comment was viewed by all political parties in Quebec as an attempt by Ottawa to interfere in the campaign and influence the vote.

“Mr. Harper is not going to decide who is going to be the next government of Quebec and it is the people of Quebec who will decide what our agenda is,” Mr. Charest said Thursday in response to Mr. Harper's comments.


And to those in the rest of Canada who were upset that the Quebec Liberals would use a $700-million boost in federal equalization payments to Quebec announced in last Monday's budget to cut personal income taxes, Mr. Charest insisted he had every right to do it.

“I will never apologize to the rest of the country for the choices I have made,” Mr. Charest said in a stern response to the criticism, saying this was money that was slashed a decade ago and belonged to Quebeckers. “I fought so that we would get the money back. And now that we have it, I am master in my areas of jurisdiction. I am Premier of Quebec; I decide what we do in our jurisdictions.”

Mr. Charest defended the province's autonomy to make its choices and insisted he was not accountable to anybody but Quebec voters. “I decide what we do in our jurisdictions – it's not Ottawa, it's not the other provinces. I am not accountable to them,” he insisted.

Mr. Harper's comments also sparked angry responses from the other parties. On Wednesday, Parti Québécois leader André Boisclair accused Mr. Harper of trying to “blackmail” Quebeckers into voting Liberal.

Action démocratique du Québec leader Mario Dumont also took Mr. Harper to task for the statements he made about not negotiating with a separatist government.

“I think Mr. Harper's intervention is not appreciated. On Monday, we will decide among Quebeckers what we want for Quebec and we don't need the prime minister of Canada to interfere in that. This isn't an appropriate intervention at this time,” Mr. Dumont told reporters.

While lauding what he said is a new era of “open-minded federalism” under Mr. Harper's Conservative government, he said there is no place for those kinds of comments. “As much as I want to protect Quebec's powers when there is an election, the prime minister of Canada must stay out of it. This is interference that I don't think is useful at this point.”

The prime minister must "stay out of the Quebec [election] campaign. I don't think any other interventions would be appropriate," he added.

In Ottawa, the government backed down from the previous day's assertion that federal-provincial negotiations would only occur under a federalist government in Quebec.

“It's obvious that we will respect the choice of Quebeckers Monday evening. That being said, we will continue to reform Canadian federalism in order to allow Quebec to grow and become stronger inside a better and united Canada,” said Transport Minister and Quebec lieutenant Lawrence Cannon.

As the campaign draws to a close, the Liberals are increasingly resigned to a minority government scenario on Monday. A new Crop poll to be published today was expected to confirm the ADQ surge even showing the party leading in the bellweather riding of St-Jean.

Even Mr. Charest, who has been trying hard to block the idea of a minority government from his mind, almost mentioned the term before stopping just in time: “I am very confident. I know we will form a mino…a majority government on March 26.”

With a close three-way race in many crucial ridings, the last thing the Liberals need is for Ottawa to create the impression they want to muscle their way into the campaign, which could further irritate voters a few days from the election.

With a report from Daniel Leblanc in Ottawa

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Liberals heading for minority govt. in Quebec?

THe ADQ certainly seems to be giving the PQ and Liberals a real battle. As for the referendum it surely would be disastrous for the PQ to hold a referendum at this point in time.


PQ minority could hold referendum
Boisclair says `democratic authority' would exist even without a majority

Mar 17, 2007 04:30 AM
Sean Gordon
Quebec Bureau Chief

MONTREAL–With a new poll pointing to an increasing likelihood of a minority government, Parti Québécois Leader André Boisclair said yesterday he would still have the legitimacy to hold a sovereignty referendum even if he wins by the slimmest of margins.

At a campaign stop in the Gaspé region of eastern Quebec, Boisclair said "of course" when asked if he would have the democratic authority to propose a referendum even if his party only won with a simple plurality of votes.

But he refused to go into greater detail, saying "you're asking me to speculate. I think we're going to have a majority PQ government."

Later in the evening, on a flight to the Magdalen Islands, Boisclair nuanced his comments by telling reporters, "I never raised the eventuality of a minority government – we will win a majority government."

Action démocratique du Québec Leader Mario Dumont scoffed at the possibility of a referendum in the case of a minority government, saying "anyone who follows politics has understood there will not be a referendum during the next mandate. That much is clear."

A new Léger Marketing poll this week, that places the PQ, Liberals and ADQ in a statistical tie, gives weight to the prospect of a minority government.

The poll also showed the Liberals trail the PQ and ADQ by 10 percentage points among francophone voters with nine days to go before the March 26 vote.

Liberal Premier Jean Charest was loath to even utter the word "minority" as he made a campaign stop in the eastern Quebec city of Rimouski, sticking to his standard response that he refuses to comment on polls.

"I have a very good feeling about this election campaign ... We will have a Liberal majority government," he said.

Dumont said he wouldn't read too much into the poll, which also reports that almost 70 per cent of respondents expect a minority government, and more than 60 per cent believe Charest will lead it.

But for the time being, the momentum is behind Dumont and Boisclair, who have narrowed the gap with the front-running Charest in recent days.

The ADQ leader said he isn't interested in forming a coalition in the event of a minority.

"In the case where we don't have a majority government, the one with the most seats makes the decisions that need to be made, and must find, on each policy matter, allies to act in the best interests of the population," he said.

The Léger poll, released late Thursday, showed the Liberals at 33 per cent support, and the PQ and ADQ with 30 per cent apiece. The survey contacted 1,000 people and is considered accurate within 3 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.