Canada: Face veils disallowed while taking citizenship oath

 
      Immigration minister Jason Kenney has placed a ban on wearing face covering garments during ceremonies at which immigrants recite the oath of citizenship. The ban would include the niqab and burkas among other things. This may cause problems if the ceremony is held outside in minus 40 degree since no doubt full face ski type masks will be covered (pun intended) by the ban. Batman better stay in the U.S. as well.
    The ruling is in line with what is happening in Quebec where a similar ban will force women to unveil when receiving government services and laws in some European countries which ban the veils in public. Tunisia bans the veils at universities a practice that has caused recent demonstrations by Salafists.
     Kenney takes the position that it is not a religious but a cultural tradition and at the pilgrimage to Mecca women must unveil themselves. Even if it is not a religious obligation but a cultural tradition this does not seem a reason to ban the veil. The practice does not seem to harm anyone. When my wife attended her citizenship ceremony the people arrived in all sorts of attire. Some were in suits, a few had traditional dress of their homeland, others dressed very casually. The citizenship guide notes that it is appropriate that those taking the oath wear their traditional dress should they wish. Several men seemed to be taking time off their construction work and were in work clothes.
    Of course liberals will say the niqab or burkha are signs of women's oppression. Nice that Islam haters can go along with this. Of course the veiled women themselves are never asked if they want to have the veil removed. No need to consult these brainwashed, oppressed women. Free them whether they like it or not.
   Apparently citizenship judges and some MPs complained to Kenney that women wearing the veil could not be seen reciting the oath. Surely the point is to be heard. Put a microphone in front of them if you can't hear them. Are dumb people --those who cannot talk-- refused citizenship on the grounds they cannot be heard reciting the oath. I think the whole issue is politicized and used by politicians as a means of gaining support. Lets see the opinion polls on support for the banning. I expect they will be very much in favor. For more see this article.

The Quebec Dept of VIrtue and Vice and Dress Codes.

The Taliban--among others-- were notorious for having a Dept. of Virtue and Vice and morality police who went around to make sure that women were following the appropriate dress codes and other rules associated by them with Islamic values. Now the same tendency has reared its ugly head in Quebec. The Quebec immigration minister has decided that a bare face is a necessity to attend schools even to learn French!

Of course many people associate the niqab with the oppression of women and are offended at seeing it in a public place. But so what? Plenty of people are offended by the clothing many young people wear which many would consider too sexually suggestive and would certainly be banned in places such as Saudi Arabia. It is true that we tolerate imposition of dress codes in certain private schools and perhaps to some degree even in public schools but in the case of the niqab there is the religious aspect involved. It would be as if one required as part of a public school dress code that no one was allowed to wear a cross or other Christian religious symbol.

Just what Quebec needs: a dress code


THE GAZETTE

Thanks to Immigration Minister Yolande James, we now have a clearer idea of what constitutes those "Quebec values" to which we all - immigrant and native-born alike - are supposed to adhere.

And it turns out that personal liberty, freedom of religion, and a willingness to embrace the French language do not enjoy the primacy of place we might have expected. A bare face apparently trumps all those desirable values. If you want to go to "our" schools to learn French, James told immigrant women, show us your faces.

The first victim of this fiat, of course, was Naema Ahmed, the Egyptian-born pharmacist whose wardrobe choice had already led to her eviction from one publicly-funded French course. On Tuesday she was thrown out of a second, in the middle of an exam yet, for the same offence - wearing a niqab. Your face or your faith, she was told. She chose her faith.

More ominously, James also revealed this week that her bureaucrats are busily preparing new rules on what we're allowed to wear when we seek to use the public services our taxes fund. That's just what Quebec needs in these troubled times: a dress code. Will we also have Values Police, modelled on the Tongue Troopers, to enforce the new rules?

So far, we have no idea what these bureaucratic dictates will entail, or what services will be affected, but the Liberal government's past eagerness to sacrifice liberty on the altar of social peace gives cause for concern. If the outcry about Muslim women's clothing choices is loud enough, the government could well scrap the nuanced recommendations of the Bouchard-Taylor commission on reasonable accommodation, in favour of more popular and more aggressive measures.

James's record also gives cause for concern. Early in her tenure she suggested banishing new arrivals to outposts like Abitibi, where they could learn to integrate into Quebec society by performing "quasi-mandatory" public service. That idea never went anywhere, but it showed a disturbing authoritarian tendency.

Compared with that, state-imposed values and clothing rules seem almost benign. But they're not, and they have no place in a democratic society. Dress codes for women are something we associate with medieval kingdoms like Saudi Arabia, and throwing women out of school because their behaviour violates fuzzy societal values sounds like something that happens in the wilder reaches of Kandahar.

It's true that the sight of a woman in a niqab can be startling to Western eyes, even offensive. But that's no reason to ban the garments - or the women. Some people feel the same way about strip shows, sex shops, and the jiggling flesh on display on Ste. Catherine St. on any summer day.

Running the risk of being offended is the price we pay for living in a free and open society. The real test of a nation's tolerance is its ability to tolerate the offensive.

© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette